<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 561 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277559</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial property-tax assessment under section 126 requires a meaningful show-cause notice before enhancement of rateable value, and fairness demands disclosure of the material basis for the proposed figure when the assessee seeks particulars. A bare notice stating only the proposed increase is insufficient to enable an effective reply. The decision also confirms that where oral objections are heard in a quasi-judicial proceeding, the same officer who hears them must decide the matter; a different officer deciding after another has heard the party undermines natural justice. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 561 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277559</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial property-tax assessment under section 126 requires a meaningful show-cause notice before enhancement of rateable value, and fairness demands disclosure of the material basis for the proposed figure when the assessee seeks particulars. A bare notice stating only the proposed increase is insufficient to enable an effective reply. The decision also confirms that where oral objections are heard in a quasi-judicial proceeding, the same officer who hears them must decide the matter; a different officer deciding after another has heard the party undermines natural justice. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>