<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15630</link>
    <description>A retrospective amendment to the proviso to section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act altered the position for assessment year 1976-77, so the section did not apply on the facts found. As a result, the death of a partner dissolved the old firm, and the business continued under a fresh partnership as a new firm for assessment purposes. Separate assessments were therefore required for the pre-death and post-death periods, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15630</link>
      <description>A retrospective amendment to the proviso to section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act altered the position for assessment year 1976-77, so the section did not apply on the facts found. As a result, the death of a partner dissolved the old firm, and the business continued under a fresh partnership as a new firm for assessment purposes. Separate assessments were therefore required for the pre-death and post-death periods, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>