<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15628</link>
    <description>The High Court noted that the Tribunal had rejected the revenue&#039;s reference request on the ground that no technical service was rendered in India, but had not addressed section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. That provision deems fees for technical services payable by a resident to accrue or arise in India, subject to the statutory exception. Because the taxability of the payment to the non-resident depended on that legal provision, the controversy raised a question of law fit for reference under section 256(2). The reference application was therefore allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case on the questions proposed by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15628</link>
      <description>The High Court noted that the Tribunal had rejected the revenue&#039;s reference request on the ground that no technical service was rendered in India, but had not addressed section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. That provision deems fees for technical services payable by a resident to accrue or arise in India, subject to the statutory exception. Because the taxability of the payment to the non-resident depended on that legal provision, the controversy raised a question of law fit for reference under section 256(2). The reference application was therefore allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case on the questions proposed by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>