<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 523 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 75,00,000 as unexplained share capital and share premium under Section 68 was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher judicial authorities&#039; decisions and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 523 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 75,00,000 as unexplained share capital and share premium under Section 68 was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher judicial authorities&#039; decisions and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>