<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371742</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the NCLT&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, declaring her as the rightful holder of 200 shares. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to rectify the register to reinstate the appellant as the shareholder. The case was remanded to the NCLT to address the remaining issues raised in the Company Petition. The parties were instructed to appear before the NCLT on a specified date, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 511 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371742</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the NCLT&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, declaring her as the rightful holder of 200 shares. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to rectify the register to reinstate the appellant as the shareholder. The case was remanded to the NCLT to address the remaining issues raised in the Company Petition. The parties were instructed to appear before the NCLT on a specified date, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>