<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 501 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax before 18/04/2006 due to the enactment of section 66A for reverse charge mechanism. The case was remanded for reevaluation regarding the outright sale of drawings and the applicability of Intellectual Property Right Service, emphasizing the importance of providing all relevant documentation during proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 501 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax before 18/04/2006 due to the enactment of section 66A for reverse charge mechanism. The case was remanded for reevaluation regarding the outright sale of drawings and the applicability of Intellectual Property Right Service, emphasizing the importance of providing all relevant documentation during proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>