<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 500 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371731</link>
    <description>Under the Finance Act, 1994, the maintainability of a challenge depends on the statutory remedy provided. Where Section 86 and the first proviso to Section 35B(i) make the revision application maintainable before the revisionary authority, Government of India, an appeal before CESTAT is not maintainable. The Tribunal followed the cited precedent and dismissed the appeal for want of maintainability, while leaving the party free to pursue the statutory revision remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 500 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371731</link>
      <description>Under the Finance Act, 1994, the maintainability of a challenge depends on the statutory remedy provided. Where Section 86 and the first proviso to Section 35B(i) make the revision application maintainable before the revisionary authority, Government of India, an appeal before CESTAT is not maintainable. The Tribunal followed the cited precedent and dismissed the appeal for want of maintainability, while leaving the party free to pursue the statutory revision remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>