<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 498 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest on the refunded amount was not payable as the refund was made within the statutory three-month limit after the liability was set aside. The decision was based on an analysis of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and relevant case law, supporting the Department&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 498 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest on the refunded amount was not payable as the refund was made within the statutory three-month limit after the liability was set aside. The decision was based on an analysis of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and relevant case law, supporting the Department&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>