https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371726 The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application filed by the appellant, emphasizing that reevaluation of previously rejected evidence would amount to a review of the order. The Tribunal's decision was grounded in the principle that rectification should address patent mistakes, not involve reappreciating evidence or reconsidering legal views. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld its original order, highlighting the importance of adhering to established legal principles in decision-making. en-us Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:37:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371726 The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application filed by the appellant, emphasizing that reevaluation of previously rejected evidence would amount to a review of the order. The Tribunal's decision was grounded in the principle that rectification should address patent mistakes, not involve reappreciating evidence or reconsidering legal views. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld its original order, highlighting the importance of adhering to established legal principles in decision-making. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371726