<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 488 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that exempted goods can be exported under Bond/LUT, applying Rule 6(6)(v) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It clarified that CBEC Circular No.754/70/2003-CX does not apply when separate accounts are maintained for exempted and dutiable goods. Refunds under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 were deemed admissible for Cenvat credit on inputs used in manufacturing exempted goods for export. The Tribunal criticized the lower authority for disregarding established precedents, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline. The decision of the Commissioner (A) was upheld, granting interest on the refund amounts and dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 488 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that exempted goods can be exported under Bond/LUT, applying Rule 6(6)(v) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It clarified that CBEC Circular No.754/70/2003-CX does not apply when separate accounts are maintained for exempted and dutiable goods. Refunds under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 were deemed admissible for Cenvat credit on inputs used in manufacturing exempted goods for export. The Tribunal criticized the lower authority for disregarding established precedents, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline. The decision of the Commissioner (A) was upheld, granting interest on the refund amounts and dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>