<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 486 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371717</link>
    <description>Where penalty proceedings depend on proper service of notice, an ex parte order is vulnerable if the record shows an alternative address and the authority does not take reasonable steps to effect service there as well. The analysis states that a postal endorsement of &quot;closed&quot; does not, by itself, justify proceeding ex parte where effective service remains doubtful. It also notes that if deemed service is to be relied on because the notice was allegedly manipulated, that basis must be recorded in the order itself; fresh reasons cannot later be added to sustain the ex parte action. The result discussed is that the penalty order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 486 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371717</link>
      <description>Where penalty proceedings depend on proper service of notice, an ex parte order is vulnerable if the record shows an alternative address and the authority does not take reasonable steps to effect service there as well. The analysis states that a postal endorsement of &quot;closed&quot; does not, by itself, justify proceeding ex parte where effective service remains doubtful. It also notes that if deemed service is to be relied on because the notice was allegedly manipulated, that basis must be recorded in the order itself; fresh reasons cannot later be added to sustain the ex parte action. The result discussed is that the penalty order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>