<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 481 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371712</link>
    <description>The court held that the Intelligence Officer lacked the authority to estimate turnover under Section 67 of the KVAT Act. Estimation must be based on clear materials and conducted by the Assessing Officer. The revisions were dismissed, and the court instructed the Registry to provide a copy of the judgment to the Commissioner of State Taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 481 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371712</link>
      <description>The court held that the Intelligence Officer lacked the authority to estimate turnover under Section 67 of the KVAT Act. Estimation must be based on clear materials and conducted by the Assessing Officer. The revisions were dismissed, and the court instructed the Registry to provide a copy of the judgment to the Commissioner of State Taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>