<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 470 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371701</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals after addressing the validity of reassessment proceedings and the merits of disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that even if the reassessment was valid, the Revenue lacked an arguable case on merit. Additionally, the Court dismissed the appeals as the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified based on factual findings regarding the availability of interest-free funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 470 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371701</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals after addressing the validity of reassessment proceedings and the merits of disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that even if the reassessment was valid, the Revenue lacked an arguable case on merit. Additionally, the Court dismissed the appeals as the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified based on factual findings regarding the availability of interest-free funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>