<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371698</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to fully disclose material facts. The reassessment was deemed valid, not constituting a change of opinion, with adequate reasons provided by the Assessing Officer. The court dismissed the Writ Appeal, affirming the necessity of reassessment due to the undisclosed advances, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371698</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to fully disclose material facts. The reassessment was deemed valid, not constituting a change of opinion, with adequate reasons provided by the Assessing Officer. The court dismissed the Writ Appeal, affirming the necessity of reassessment due to the undisclosed advances, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>