<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the year in which the advance from Formula One Management Limited was treated as income. It upheld the TDS requirement on lease rent and interest paid to Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority, while confirming that no TDS was necessary on bank guarantee commission payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the year in which the advance from Formula One Management Limited was treated as income. It upheld the TDS requirement on lease rent and interest paid to Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority, while confirming that no TDS was necessary on bank guarantee commission payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>