<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 455 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be defective due to the lack of specification of the charge. Consequently, the penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceled the penalty of Rs. 2,70,350/- imposed by the AO for the assessment year 2011-12, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 455 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be defective due to the lack of specification of the charge. Consequently, the penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceled the penalty of Rs. 2,70,350/- imposed by the AO for the assessment year 2011-12, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>