<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371680</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed under Sections 112 and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the appeal challenging the penalties totaling &amp;amp;8377;73,000/- and &amp;amp;8377;50,000/-. The CESTAT&#039;s discretion in deciding appeals based on the value of the subject matter was emphasized, with the court finding the dismissal of the appeal justified due to the appellant&#039;s lack of success in previous proceedings. The judgment highlights the significance of considering appeal value, adjudicating body&#039;s discretion, and case circumstances in customs appeals, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s decision in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371680</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed under Sections 112 and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the appeal challenging the penalties totaling &amp;amp;8377;73,000/- and &amp;amp;8377;50,000/-. The CESTAT&#039;s discretion in deciding appeals based on the value of the subject matter was emphasized, with the court finding the dismissal of the appeal justified due to the appellant&#039;s lack of success in previous proceedings. The judgment highlights the significance of considering appeal value, adjudicating body&#039;s discretion, and case circumstances in customs appeals, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s decision in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>