<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 446 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny provisional release of seized goods, allowing for completion of adjudication within two months or provisional release under Section 110A of the Customs Act if adjudication is not finalized. The appellants were instructed to cooperate without unnecessary adjournments, emphasizing compliance without undue delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 08:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 446 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny provisional release of seized goods, allowing for completion of adjudication within two months or provisional release under Section 110A of the Customs Act if adjudication is not finalized. The appellants were instructed to cooperate without unnecessary adjournments, emphasizing compliance without undue delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>