<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 445 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371676</link>
    <description>Repeated opportunities for personal hearing and cross-examination were given, including adjourned dates fixed for that purpose, and the appellant failed to avail them. On that record, the Tribunal found no denial of natural justice and no basis to grant complete dispensation of pre-deposit. However, because the same issues arose across four appeals, it granted partial relief in the interests of justice by directing a reduced pre-deposit of 50 per cent of the total penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:37:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 445 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371676</link>
      <description>Repeated opportunities for personal hearing and cross-examination were given, including adjourned dates fixed for that purpose, and the appellant failed to avail them. On that record, the Tribunal found no denial of natural justice and no basis to grant complete dispensation of pre-deposit. However, because the same issues arose across four appeals, it granted partial relief in the interests of justice by directing a reduced pre-deposit of 50 per cent of the total penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>