<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 443 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371674</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents on the maintainability issue. The court held that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum based on the doctrine of forum conveniens and Section 42 of the PMLA, despite a part of the cause of action arising in Delhi. The petitioner was directed to seek relief in the Bombay High Court, with the interim protection extended for ten days for the petitioner to take further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 443 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371674</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the respondents on the maintainability issue. The court held that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum based on the doctrine of forum conveniens and Section 42 of the PMLA, despite a part of the cause of action arising in Delhi. The petitioner was directed to seek relief in the Bombay High Court, with the interim protection extended for ten days for the petitioner to take further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>