https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371668 The Tribunal set aside the order on the first issue, finding the adjudicating authority failed to consider relevant precedents and Circulars. On the second issue, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's defense of invoices issued by electronic media for Cenvat credit but remanded the matter for further consideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present additional evidence. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:36:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371668 The Tribunal set aside the order on the first issue, finding the adjudicating authority failed to consider relevant precedents and Circulars. On the second issue, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's defense of invoices issued by electronic media for Cenvat credit but remanded the matter for further consideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present additional evidence. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371668