<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 436 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371667</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on the full value of a composite output service became excess tax when debit notes later reduced the value for deficiency, so the amount corresponding to the debit notes was not payable again and could be adjusted against future liability under Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, with interest only for the intervening period. On the third-party service component included in the appellant&#039;s billed composite service, Cenvat credit was admissible because that component formed part of the taxable output service and tax had already been discharged on the full invoice value. The demand and connected penalties were therefore unsustainable and were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 06:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=546096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 436 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371667</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on the full value of a composite output service became excess tax when debit notes later reduced the value for deficiency, so the amount corresponding to the debit notes was not payable again and could be adjusted against future liability under Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, with interest only for the intervening period. On the third-party service component included in the appellant&#039;s billed composite service, Cenvat credit was admissible because that component formed part of the taxable output service and tax had already been discharged on the full invoice value. The demand and connected penalties were therefore unsustainable and were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>