https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371657 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal of the appellant on both merits and limitation grounds. The decision emphasized the correct interpretation and application of Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and highlighted the importance of regular audits in determining the applicability of the extended period for demanding ineligible CENVAT credit. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Dec 2018 07:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371657 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal of the appellant on both merits and limitation grounds. The decision emphasized the correct interpretation and application of Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and highlighted the importance of regular audits in determining the applicability of the extended period for demanding ineligible CENVAT credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371657