<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 408 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371639</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a 100% penalty on the appellant, considering unexplained income, delayed return filings, and evidence of intent to evade tax. Legal precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act supported the penalty imposition, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 408 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371639</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a 100% penalty on the appellant, considering unexplained income, delayed return filings, and evidence of intent to evade tax. Legal precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act supported the penalty imposition, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>