https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371619 The Supreme Court held that the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was time-barred due to a delay of 131 days, which exceeded the statutory period for filing such an application. The Court set aside the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta and dismissed the petition under Section 34 as being beyond the prescribed timeline. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371619 The Supreme Court held that the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was time-barred due to a delay of 131 days, which exceeded the statutory period for filing such an application. The Court set aside the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta and dismissed the petition under Section 34 as being beyond the prescribed timeline. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371619