<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 385 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority due to procedural irregularities, failure to consider all submissions, incorrect penalty imposition, and computational errors in the service tax amount. The original order was set aside, emphasizing compliance with legal principles and a thorough review of all relevant aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 385 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority due to procedural irregularities, failure to consider all submissions, incorrect penalty imposition, and computational errors in the service tax amount. The original order was set aside, emphasizing compliance with legal principles and a thorough review of all relevant aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>