<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 379 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they were entitled to interest on delayed refund after three months from the date of filing the refund claims. The Tribunal found that the issue of the proper form for filing the claims was not raised in the show cause notices, therefore setting aside the orders denying interest on delayed refund and allowing the appeals filed by the appellant with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 379 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they were entitled to interest on delayed refund after three months from the date of filing the refund claims. The Tribunal found that the issue of the proper form for filing the claims was not raised in the show cause notices, therefore setting aside the orders denying interest on delayed refund and allowing the appeals filed by the appellant with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>