<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Adjudicating Authority as it exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, emphasizing that adjudication cannot go beyond the notice&#039;s ambit. The demand under &#039;Advertising Agency Services&#039; was deemed impermissible since it was not included in the notice. While part of the demand was dropped, the appeal was allowed based on established legal principles and the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 377 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Adjudicating Authority as it exceeded the scope of the show cause notice, emphasizing that adjudication cannot go beyond the notice&#039;s ambit. The demand under &#039;Advertising Agency Services&#039; was deemed impermissible since it was not included in the notice. While part of the demand was dropped, the appeal was allowed based on established legal principles and the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>