<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 365 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371596</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty confirmed for clandestine removal, the redemption fine, and the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment highlighted the distraction caused by the son&#039;s wedding as a valid reason for discrepancies in goods inventory and emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in proving allegations of clandestine activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 365 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371596</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty confirmed for clandestine removal, the redemption fine, and the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment highlighted the distraction caused by the son&#039;s wedding as a valid reason for discrepancies in goods inventory and emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in proving allegations of clandestine activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>