https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371594 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of catalyst and refractory insulators, in a dispute over the denial of cenvat credit based on invoices under a different entity's name. The Tribunal held that the denial of credit was unjustified both factually and legally, emphasizing the proper utilization of duty paid inputs by the appellant. The judgment stressed the importance of fair hearings and factual verification before disentitling a manufacturer from cenvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the denial and penalties imposed, providing relief to the appellants. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:51:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371594 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of catalyst and refractory insulators, in a dispute over the denial of cenvat credit based on invoices under a different entity's name. The Tribunal held that the denial of credit was unjustified both factually and legally, emphasizing the proper utilization of duty paid inputs by the appellant. The judgment stressed the importance of fair hearings and factual verification before disentitling a manufacturer from cenvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the denial and penalties imposed, providing relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371594