https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277522 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, including classifying infrastructure receipts as income from house property, disallowing foreign traveling expenses due to lack of evidence, allowing educational expenses based on precedent, rejecting ad-hoc disallowances, and setting aside disallowance under Section 14A as it couldn't be applied retrospectively. The Tribunal also remanded the matter of rent paid to a sister concern for proper verification. The decisions were based on legal precedents and provisions of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of evidence and accurate classification. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277522 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, including classifying infrastructure receipts as income from house property, disallowing foreign traveling expenses due to lack of evidence, allowing educational expenses based on precedent, rejecting ad-hoc disallowances, and setting aside disallowance under Section 14A as it couldn't be applied retrospectively. The Tribunal also remanded the matter of rent paid to a sister concern for proper verification. The decisions were based on legal precedents and provisions of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of evidence and accurate classification. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277522