https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277527 The majority view upheld the WTM's findings that the appellants were insiders, sold/pledged shares while in possession of UPSI, and justified the restraint order and disgorgement of unlawful gains. The minority view called for a reassessment of the cases, emphasizing the need for individual consideration and the relevance of the SFIO Report and CBI Court findings. The appeals were disposed of in terms of the majority view, with specific directions for fresh consideration by the WTM of SEBI for certain appellants. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Dec 2018 06:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277527 The majority view upheld the WTM's findings that the appellants were insiders, sold/pledged shares while in possession of UPSI, and justified the restraint order and disgorgement of unlawful gains. The minority view called for a reassessment of the cases, emphasizing the need for individual consideration and the relevance of the SFIO Report and CBI Court findings. The appeals were disposed of in terms of the majority view, with specific directions for fresh consideration by the WTM of SEBI for certain appellants. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277527