<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371580</link>
    <description>Under Sections 122 and 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a valid gift requires a voluntary transfer without consideration, by a registered instrument for immovable property, accepted during the donor&#039;s lifetime. A document styled as a gift deed will not amount to a completed gift where it discloses consideration, reserves possession and enjoyment to the donor, and is intended to operate only after the donor&#039;s death; in that situation, the essential elements of a gift are absent and any conditional transfer remains incomplete until the condition is fulfilled. The Supreme Court held that the document was not a completed gift and that the donor was competent to cancel it, setting aside the High Court&#039;s finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371580</link>
      <description>Under Sections 122 and 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a valid gift requires a voluntary transfer without consideration, by a registered instrument for immovable property, accepted during the donor&#039;s lifetime. A document styled as a gift deed will not amount to a completed gift where it discloses consideration, reserves possession and enjoyment to the donor, and is intended to operate only after the donor&#039;s death; in that situation, the essential elements of a gift are absent and any conditional transfer remains incomplete until the condition is fulfilled. The Supreme Court held that the document was not a completed gift and that the donor was competent to cancel it, setting aside the High Court&#039;s finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>