<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1284 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277518</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the gift deed, even with the donor retaining possession and the right to receive rents during her lifetime. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the gift was validly executed and accepted, and that the revocation deed was null and void. The court reiterated that under Sections 122 and 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, delivery of possession is not required for a valid gift of immovable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1284 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277518</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the gift deed, even with the donor retaining possession and the right to receive rents during her lifetime. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the gift was validly executed and accepted, and that the revocation deed was null and void. The court reiterated that under Sections 122 and 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, delivery of possession is not required for a valid gift of immovable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>