<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15589</link>
    <description>The court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the trust&#039;s activities related to film distribution rights exploitation did not constitute &#039;business activity.&#039; The income derived was considered part of the trust&#039;s corpus, aligned with its charitable objectives, and not taxable income under the Income-tax Act. The court concluded that the trust was not engaged in a business of film distribution, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions on all issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15589</link>
      <description>The court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the trust&#039;s activities related to film distribution rights exploitation did not constitute &#039;business activity.&#039; The income derived was considered part of the trust&#039;s corpus, aligned with its charitable objectives, and not taxable income under the Income-tax Act. The court concluded that the trust was not engaged in a business of film distribution, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions on all issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>