https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277516 A plaint describing immovable property by its plot number in the Nagar Panchayat record is sufficient for identification under Order VII Rule 3 CPC, even if separate area or boundaries are not pleaded. Where the entry already exists in the revenue record, the property cannot be treated as unidentifiable on that basis alone. The appellate court was not required to remand the newly framed issue when the existing evidence was enough, because Sections 107 and 103 CPC permit final determination on the record in appropriate cases. Reversal of findings on ownership and possession solely for alleged non-identifiability was therefore unsustainable. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277516 A plaint describing immovable property by its plot number in the Nagar Panchayat record is sufficient for identification under Order VII Rule 3 CPC, even if separate area or boundaries are not pleaded. Where the entry already exists in the revenue record, the property cannot be treated as unidentifiable on that basis alone. The appellate court was not required to remand the newly framed issue when the existing evidence was enough, because Sections 107 and 103 CPC permit final determination on the record in appropriate cases. Reversal of findings on ownership and possession solely for alleged non-identifiability was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277516