<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15587</link>
    <description>Annual value under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is determined by the sum for which the property may reasonably be expected to let from year to year, and the lease rent agreed between the parties is not conclusive for that purpose. The Kerala HC held that the agreed rent did not control the statutory measure of annual value, and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees. The remaining controversy was not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15587</link>
      <description>Annual value under section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is determined by the sum for which the property may reasonably be expected to let from year to year, and the lease rent agreed between the parties is not conclusive for that purpose. The Kerala HC held that the agreed rent did not control the statutory measure of annual value, and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees. The remaining controversy was not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>