<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision to adopt the lower annual letting value for the property, as claimed by the assessee, based on rent receivable rather than the actual rent received. The court emphasized the provisions of section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act in determining the annual value and ruled against the assessee&#039;s alternative contention, favoring the Revenue&#039;s stance that the actual rent received should be the determining factor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:42:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision to adopt the lower annual letting value for the property, as claimed by the assessee, based on rent receivable rather than the actual rent received. The court emphasized the provisions of section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act in determining the annual value and ruled against the assessee&#039;s alternative contention, favoring the Revenue&#039;s stance that the actual rent received should be the determining factor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>