<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 346 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371577</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a detention/seizure order, emphasizing that successive writ petitions for the same cause of action are impermissible. The court noted that the seized goods had been released upon compliance with statutory provisions, making the matter final. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies against the earlier petition&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 346 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371577</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a detention/seizure order, emphasizing that successive writ petitions for the same cause of action are impermissible. The court noted that the seized goods had been released upon compliance with statutory provisions, making the matter final. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies against the earlier petition&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>