<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 340 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371571</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal against the final order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing that the impugned order must be considered in its entirety. The Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before them as accepting the appellant&#039;s arguments would imply that the Department was incorrect in deciding the classification issue against the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 340 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371571</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal against the final order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing that the impugned order must be considered in its entirety. The Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before them as accepting the appellant&#039;s arguments would imply that the Department was incorrect in deciding the classification issue against the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>