<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 332 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371563</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions to interest income, disallowing claimed interest payments as the assessees were not in a finance business. Partners&#039; withdrawals were not considered business loans, leading to disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 37. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on this issue, upholding disallowance of interest paid to depositors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 05:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 332 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371563</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions to interest income, disallowing claimed interest payments as the assessees were not in a finance business. Partners&#039; withdrawals were not considered business loans, leading to disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 37. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on this issue, upholding disallowance of interest paid to depositors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>