<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing and directing the A.O to re-compute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only investments yielding exempt income. It was held that the disallowance under Section 14A should not be factored into computing &#039;book profit&#039; under Section 115JB. The A.O was tasked with recalculating the disallowance accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 05:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing and directing the A.O to re-compute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only investments yielding exempt income. It was held that the disallowance under Section 14A should not be factored into computing &#039;book profit&#039; under Section 115JB. The A.O was tasked with recalculating the disallowance accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>