<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund under Sec. 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unjustified post-amendment of Sec. 43B. The disallowed amount of &amp;amp;8377; 6,30,867 was deleted, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed on 26/09/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 05:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 311 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund under Sec. 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unjustified post-amendment of Sec. 43B. The disallowed amount of &amp;amp;8377; 6,30,867 was deleted, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed on 26/09/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>