<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371537</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal extended the appellant the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% within 30 days from the order date, highlighting the necessity of granting such a choice when authorities fail to do so. Failure to comply would result in the full penalty amount being applicable. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the appellant with this opportunity, considering the timely payment of Service Tax and interest before the adjudicating order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 05:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371537</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal extended the appellant the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% within 30 days from the order date, highlighting the necessity of granting such a choice when authorities fail to do so. Failure to comply would result in the full penalty amount being applicable. The tribunal emphasized the importance of providing the appellant with this opportunity, considering the timely payment of Service Tax and interest before the adjudicating order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>