<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1916 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277498</link>
    <description>Section 43 of the Contract Act applies only to a joint promise and does not authorise fastening liability on one heir alone where rent liability arises from an inherited tenancy claimed against all the heirs. A suit framed against all heirs of a deceased tenant, treating them as holding one tenancy, could not be converted into a case against a single heir on an unpleaded footing. The decree against the lone heir therefore could not stand, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination against all defendants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1916 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 17:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1916 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277498</link>
      <description>Section 43 of the Contract Act applies only to a joint promise and does not authorise fastening liability on one heir alone where rent liability arises from an inherited tenancy claimed against all the heirs. A suit framed against all heirs of a deceased tenant, treating them as holding one tenancy, could not be converted into a case against a single heir on an unpleaded footing. The decree against the lone heir therefore could not stand, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination against all defendants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1916 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>