<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15568</link>
    <description>Interest for delay in filing a return under Section 139(8) is compensatory, and it is not leviable where advance tax already paid exceeds the tax ultimately assessed. On the facts stated, no interest arose merely because the return was filed beyond time, since the tax liability stood fully covered after adjustment of advance tax. The registered-firm status did not create a separate basis for charging interest in the absence of any remaining tax payable. Interest under Section 139(8) was therefore not chargeable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15568</link>
      <description>Interest for delay in filing a return under Section 139(8) is compensatory, and it is not leviable where advance tax already paid exceeds the tax ultimately assessed. On the facts stated, no interest arose merely because the return was filed beyond time, since the tax liability stood fully covered after adjustment of advance tax. The registered-firm status did not create a separate basis for charging interest in the absence of any remaining tax payable. Interest under Section 139(8) was therefore not chargeable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>