<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 9 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15563</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s application seeking mandamus to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for referring questions of law to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found the proposed questions by the Revenue inadequate and not reflective of the actual contentions. It emphasized its limited jurisdiction to reframe questions based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings but not to introduce entirely new questions. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the application under section 256(1), stating that the questions for reference did not align with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 9 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15563</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s application seeking mandamus to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for referring questions of law to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found the proposed questions by the Revenue inadequate and not reflective of the actual contentions. It emphasized its limited jurisdiction to reframe questions based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings but not to introduce entirely new questions. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the application under section 256(1), stating that the questions for reference did not align with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>