https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277476 Sections 81 to 86 of the Marwar Land Revenue Act were upheld as constitutionally valid. The SC held that territorial classification under Article 14 was permissible because local conditions could differ, and the petitioners had not shown Marwar to be similarly situated to other parts of Rajasthan. Article 19(1)(f) was not breached because the right to hold property was treated as including only a right to recover reasonable rent, and fair rent-fixing legislation was permissible. Section 86 was also sustained: requiring recorded reasons for applying rent rates from an earlier date prevented the discretion from being arbitrary, and retrospective operation alone did not invalidate it. Article 31(2) was rejected because regulation of landlord-tenant relations and reduction of rent was not compulsory acquisition. en-us Tue, 27 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:06:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277476 Sections 81 to 86 of the Marwar Land Revenue Act were upheld as constitutionally valid. The SC held that territorial classification under Article 14 was permissible because local conditions could differ, and the petitioners had not shown Marwar to be similarly situated to other parts of Rajasthan. Article 19(1)(f) was not breached because the right to hold property was treated as including only a right to recover reasonable rent, and fair rent-fixing legislation was permissible. Section 86 was also sustained: requiring recorded reasons for applying rent rates from an earlier date prevented the discretion from being arbitrary, and retrospective operation alone did not invalidate it. Article 31(2) was rejected because regulation of landlord-tenant relations and reduction of rent was not compulsory acquisition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277476