<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proving a &quot;Benami&quot; Transaction Requires Evidence; Cash for Future Promises Isn&#039;t Enough Due to Lack of Name Lending.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43090</link>
    <description>Benami transactions - The existence of the “benami” transaction has to be proved by the authorities i.e. the person who alleges the transaction - The transaction where cash is paid to person in lieu of a future promise cannot be a “benami” transaction as there is no lending of name.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=545619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proving a &quot;Benami&quot; Transaction Requires Evidence; Cash for Future Promises Isn&#039;t Enough Due to Lack of Name Lending.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43090</link>
      <description>Benami transactions - The existence of the “benami” transaction has to be proved by the authorities i.e. the person who alleges the transaction - The transaction where cash is paid to person in lieu of a future promise cannot be a “benami” transaction as there is no lending of name.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 08:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>