<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15561</link>
    <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was unavailable because the statutory condition of manufacturing or producing articles was not satisfied, and the earlier finding in the assessee&#039;s own case was followed; this issue was decided against the assessee. Extra-shift allowance had to be computed by reference to the days on which the concern actually worked double shift or triple shift, not by reference to a particular item of machinery or plant; the computation adopted was upheld and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15561</link>
      <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was unavailable because the statutory condition of manufacturing or producing articles was not satisfied, and the earlier finding in the assessee&#039;s own case was followed; this issue was decided against the assessee. Extra-shift allowance had to be computed by reference to the days on which the concern actually worked double shift or triple shift, not by reference to a particular item of machinery or plant; the computation adopted was upheld and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>